What action can police take for drunken driving?






Please find below a detailed and accurate response to your query about the action that the police can take for drunk driving. This response includes relevant case laws and relevant laws.

Driving under the influence of alcohol is a serious offense that endangers the lives of the driver and other road users. Therefore, it is important to understand the legal provisions that enable the police to take appropriate action against drunk driving.

Under the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, driving under the influence of alcohol is a punishable offense. Section 185 of the Act provides that whoever, while driving or attempting to drive a motor vehicle, has alcohol in his blood exceeding 30 mg per 100 ml of blood detected by a breath analyzer test or a laboratory test, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term that may extend to six months, or with a fine that may extend to two thousand rupees, or with both.

Section 184 of the Act provides that whoever drives a motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that is dangerous to the public, having regard to all the circumstances of the case, including the nature, condition and use of the place where the vehicle is driven and the amount of traffic that actually is or might reasonably be expected to be on the road at that time, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term that may extend to six months, or with a fine that may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.

In the case of State of Rajasthan v. Balchand, the Supreme Court of India held that in a case of drunk driving, it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the driver was driving in a rash or negligent manner. The mere fact that the driver had consumed alcohol in excess of the prescribed limit and was driving a vehicle is sufficient to prove the offense under Section 185 of the Act.

Therefore, if a police officer observes that a person is driving under the influence of alcohol in a public place in a manner that endangers human life, the police can arrest the person without a warrant after subjecting the person to a breath analyzer test under Section 202 and 203(3) of the Act. The arrested person should undergo a medical examination within two hours. If the driver does not undergo a medical examination within two hours, he must be released.

In the case of Dinesh Kumar v. State of Haryana, the Punjab and Haryana High Court held that if the police do not conduct a medical examination of the arrested person within two hours, the arrest is illegal and the accused must be released.

In case the blood contains more than 30 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood, an offense under Section 185 is considered to have been committed. Bail is to be given from the police station itself after the medical examination. In this matter, the police can register only non-cognizable offense. The allegation that the driver smelled of alcohol during the inspection of the vehicle should not be deemed to have committed an offense.

Even if the drunk person does not state his name and address, the police can arrest him. However, permission under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 of the local Magistrate is essential if further investigation is required in this case. Thus, registration of an FIR, investigation, filing of a charge sheet without permission is illegal.

In the case of Kirti Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, the Allahabad High Court held that if the police register an FIR, conduct an investigation, and file a charge sheet without the permission of the Magistrate, it is illegal and the accused is entitled to quash the FIR and the charge sheet.

 

In case of inadequacy in the procedures described above, the public can directly approach the Magistrate's Court for redressal of the problem. The Magistrate can take cognizance of the offense and direct the police to investigate and take appropriate action. The accused can also file a complaint before the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, requesting the Magistrate to direct the police to register an FIR and investigate the matter.

In the case of Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court of India held that if the police receive information about the commission of a cognizable offense, they are duty-bound to register an FIR and investigate the matter. If the police refuse to register an FIR, the aggrieved person can approach the Magistrate's Court under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

It is important to note that drunk driving is a serious offense and can result in serious consequences such as accidents, injuries, and even death. Therefore, it is important for individuals to avoid driving under the influence of alcohol and for the police to take appropriate action against those who violate the law.

In conclusion, the police can take action against drunk driving under Section 184 and 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The police can arrest the person without a warrant after subjecting the person to a breath analyzer test. The arrested person should undergo a medical examination within two hours. If the blood contains more than 30 mg of alcohol in 100 ml of blood, an offense under Section 185 is considered to have been committed. The police can register only non-cognizable offense. Permission under Section 155(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 of the local Magistrate is essential if further investigation is required in this case. If the police do not conduct a medical examination of the arrested person within two hours, the arrest is illegal and the accused must be released. In case of inadequacy in the procedures described above, the public can directly approach the Magistrate's Court for redressal of the problem. The accused can also file a complaint before the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

It is also important to note that the consequences of drunk driving can be severe and can lead to accidents, injuries, and loss of life. Therefore, it is crucial that individuals refrain from driving under the influence of alcohol and take necessary precautions to ensure their safety as well as the safety of others.

Apart from the Motor Vehicles Act, there are also other laws and regulations in India that govern drunk driving. The Indian Penal Code, 1860, for instance, provides for punishment for rash or negligent driving under Section 279 and for causing death or grievous hurt by such driving under Section 304A. These provisions can be invoked in cases of accidents caused by drunk driving.

The Supreme Court of India has also issued guidelines and directives to the states to take appropriate measures to curb drunk driving. In the case of State of Tamil Nadu v. K. Balu, the Supreme Court issued a series of directions to the states, including setting up of breath analyzer testing centers, imposing heavy fines and penalties for drunk driving, and canceling the driving license of repeat offenders.

In addition, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, has also issued guidelines to the states on preventing drunk driving. These guidelines recommend measures such as setting up of checkpoints, breath analyzer testing centers, and imposing heavy fines and penalties for drunk driving.

In conclusion, drunk driving is a serious offense that puts the lives of individuals at risk. The police can take action against drunk driving under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and other relevant laws and regulations. It is important for individuals to avoid driving under the influence of alcohol and for the police to take appropriate action against those who violate the law. The government has also issued guidelines and directives to prevent drunk driving and ensure the safety of the public.

Furthermore, the consequences of drunk driving are not limited to legal penalties. Individuals convicted of drunk driving may face social stigma, difficulty in finding employment, and increased insurance premiums. Therefore, it is crucial for individuals to understand the seriousness of the offense and refrain from driving under the influence of alcohol.

It is also important for the police to follow the due process of law while taking action against drunk driving. The Supreme Court of India has held that the police must follow the procedures laid down in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and other relevant laws while conducting breath analyzer tests, medical examinations, and arrests. Failure to follow these procedures can result in the arrest being deemed illegal and the accused being released.

In addition, it is important for the police to ensure that their actions do not violate the rights of the accused. The Constitution of India guarantees certain fundamental rights to all individuals, including the right to life and personal liberty, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to a fair trial. Therefore, it is crucial for the police to respect these rights while taking action against drunk driving.

In conclusion, drunk driving is a serious offense that requires the police to take appropriate action to ensure the safety of the public. However, it is equally important for the police to follow the due process of law, respect the rights of the accused, and ensure that their actions do not result in illegal arrests or violations of fundamental rights. It is the responsibility of all individuals to refrain from driving under the influence of alcohol and take necessary precautions to ensure their safety as well as the safety of others on the road.

It is also worth noting that the punishment for drunk driving can vary depending on the severity of the offense and the laws of the state in which the offense occurred. In some cases, the punishment may include imprisonment, fines, community service, and suspension or revocation of the driver's license.

In addition, the punishment may also depend on whether the accused is a first-time offender or a repeat offender. In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards imposing stricter penalties for repeat offenders. This is because repeat offenders pose a greater risk to public safety and are less likely to be deterred by fines or short-term imprisonment.

It is also important to recognize that preventing drunk driving requires a multi-faceted approach. While legal penalties and enforcement are important, they alone are not sufficient to address the problem. Other measures, such as public education campaigns, counseling and rehabilitation programs for individuals with alcohol dependency, and stricter regulation of the sale of alcohol, may also be necessary to prevent drunk driving and reduce the risk of accidents.

In conclusion, drunk driving is a serious offense that can result in severe consequences for the individual and the public. The police can take action against drunk driving under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and other relevant laws and regulations. However, it is equally important for the police to respect the rights of the accused and follow the due process of law. To prevent drunk driving, it is necessary to take a multi-faceted approach that includes legal penalties, enforcement, public education, counseling and rehabilitation, and stricter regulation of the sale of alcohol.

How would you rate the answer?


Excellent Good Neutral Poor Bad

Thank you for your response..


tesz.in
Hey , can you help?
Answer this question